Eastern Conference:
1. Cleveland
2. Toronto
3.
Miami
4. Chicago
5. Indiana
6. Charlotte
7. Brooklyn
8.
Washington
===========
9. Detroit
10. New York
11. Atlanta
12. Orlando
13.
Milwaukee
14. Boston
15. Philadelphia
Western Conference:1.
San Antonio
2. LA Clippers
3. Oklahoma City
4. Golden State
5.
Dallas
6. Phoenix
7. Portland
8. Minnesota
=============
9. Memphis
10. New
Orleans
11. Houston
12. Denver
13. LA Lakers
14. Sacramento
15.
Utah
More notes:
• My surprise team of the year- Minnesota. Very
young, very athletic- I could see Wiggins as the rookie of the year and Bennett
as the most Improved player of the year. In a loaded Western Conference, I think
they make the playoffs
• Houston- last year I thought they’d gel and be real
contenders. I’m no longer a believer. Harden+Howard+ role players no longer
seems like a good combination, especially in this era of three point shooters.
• But damn, the West is Loaded. The #10 team here could contend for a top
three spot in the East.
• While the Eastern Conference is better this year
than last year, it’s not because the top teams are great- it’s that the mediocre
teams are taking a few steps forward
• I’m not a believer in Washington. I
think they overplayed their starters, don’t have any bench, and got lucky with
health last year.
• I have no idea how Chicago, Miami, or Indiana will do. I
could see any of the three challenging for the top spot in the East; I could see
any of the three collapsing completely.
• Complete wild guesses on the
lottery: 1) Utah 2) Philadelphia 3) Denver. They will vote to ‘flatten’ the
lottery, but it won’t begin until 2016
• In the Western Conference, I will
keep picking San Antonio until they prove me wrong. And in the Eastern
Conference, I think the Cavs are more talented and healthier than any other team
in the conference. And in the finals…
• Damn. Last year was the single most
frustrating year I have ever experienced as a sports fan. Watching a team
you expected to take a step forward just fall apart and become a disaster was
painful. I have been a longtime Mike Brown fan, but he was the wrong coach for
this team. It was ugly.
• And then, karma payback. The Cavs won the lottery.
They went in a completely different direction with the new coach, and picked
someone with a worldwide reputation for being an offensive genius. They didn’t
panic and drafted the person I thought was the best player. I was thrilled long
before LeBron came back. And then he came back- something I never thought would
happen.
• I’m a Cleveland sports fan. I’ve come to dread the worst. Right
now, I’m terrified how something that seems to be put together so perfectly
could fall apart. But everything seems set up so perfectly. On paper,
this works… San Antonio is a year older. Cleveland is younger than Miami,
deeper, and hungrier. The Cleveland Cavaliers end the Curse and win the NBA
Championship in six games.
(Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’ll be hiding
under the bed))
Thursday, October 16, 2014
Sunday, October 12, 2014
Top 10- Epic Rap Battles
Next Month, Epic Rap Battles returns to Youtube. Nice Peter and Epic Lloyd have had three seasons of mixing rap battles with celebrities, and they've been consistently hysterical. I thought I'd put up my ten favorites of the first three seasons:
(Some cursing)
(Some cursing)
Sunday, September 7, 2014
Thoughts on Dungeons and Dragons- 5th edition
Wizards of the Coast is releasing the 5th edition of Dungeons and Dragons. I've played DnD since I was ten, back in first edition. Currently, I'm in a campaign using DnD 3.5 (third edition with some rules modifications). Some initial thoughts looking over the new Player's Handbook:
* Some background- the 1st edition was groundbreaking- but it was also complicated as hell. If you ever read the comic Knights of the Dinner Table , with their ridiculous charts and tables? Yeah- 1st edition was like that. A lot of groundbreaking work- but enough dice rolling to make your eyes bleed.
Second edition started off by simplifying things- but then they brought out splat books. Books with variations of classes and races. And with so many splat books out, it wasn't hard for people to find unbeatable combinations. It was really unbalanced (all of the editions have some class balancing issues- but 2nd edition was extremely bad on this one)
Third edition- my favorite version, easily. Allowing people to constantly switch classes gave them variety without the ridiculous rules from the 1st edition. It was complicated, but nothing like first edition. All in all, the best version of the game.
Fourth edition- it was a MMORPG (computer game) on paper. It felt like less of a role-playing game and more of a combat tactical game. And everything was so damned cookie-cutter; Every 8th level fight was one of two types. I bought the books and tried to play, but lost interest. Now it sits collecting dust on my bookshelf.
With all of that in mind, here's some thoughts on the new version of the game:
* Fifth edition- my first thought is that it's back to being a RPG. Less tactics, more character development, more options. Considering that I wasn't interested in fourth edition at all, this is a plus to me.
* It appears simpler than 3rd edition- the proficiency bonus goes up by overall level, so no more skill points. There are backgrounds instead of feats
* I would really like to have seen some sample characters to see how everything fits together. Just reading the descriptions, all of the powers seem jumbled together. Some examples of each of the character classes might help clean things up.
* Balance issues? I'm sure there are some. Everyone who plays DnD min/maxes (aka, tries to find the best angle to help their characters succeed). The rule in DnD used to be that wizards were really weak at lower levels and really strong at high levels. They've strengthened spellcasters at lower levels (more spells, more HP)- so I'm curious if they've also lowered their potency at the high levels compared to other classes.
* Personally, I'm happy with third edition. But if a player thought 3rd edition was too much paperwork, I could see where 5th edition would appeal to them.
* Some background- the 1st edition was groundbreaking- but it was also complicated as hell. If you ever read the comic Knights of the Dinner Table , with their ridiculous charts and tables? Yeah- 1st edition was like that. A lot of groundbreaking work- but enough dice rolling to make your eyes bleed.
Second edition started off by simplifying things- but then they brought out splat books. Books with variations of classes and races. And with so many splat books out, it wasn't hard for people to find unbeatable combinations. It was really unbalanced (all of the editions have some class balancing issues- but 2nd edition was extremely bad on this one)
Third edition- my favorite version, easily. Allowing people to constantly switch classes gave them variety without the ridiculous rules from the 1st edition. It was complicated, but nothing like first edition. All in all, the best version of the game.
Fourth edition- it was a MMORPG (computer game) on paper. It felt like less of a role-playing game and more of a combat tactical game. And everything was so damned cookie-cutter; Every 8th level fight was one of two types. I bought the books and tried to play, but lost interest. Now it sits collecting dust on my bookshelf.
With all of that in mind, here's some thoughts on the new version of the game:
* Fifth edition- my first thought is that it's back to being a RPG. Less tactics, more character development, more options. Considering that I wasn't interested in fourth edition at all, this is a plus to me.
* It appears simpler than 3rd edition- the proficiency bonus goes up by overall level, so no more skill points. There are backgrounds instead of feats
* I would really like to have seen some sample characters to see how everything fits together. Just reading the descriptions, all of the powers seem jumbled together. Some examples of each of the character classes might help clean things up.
* Balance issues? I'm sure there are some. Everyone who plays DnD min/maxes (aka, tries to find the best angle to help their characters succeed). The rule in DnD used to be that wizards were really weak at lower levels and really strong at high levels. They've strengthened spellcasters at lower levels (more spells, more HP)- so I'm curious if they've also lowered their potency at the high levels compared to other classes.
* Personally, I'm happy with third edition. But if a player thought 3rd edition was too much paperwork, I could see where 5th edition would appeal to them.
Wednesday, September 3, 2014
NFL Predictions 2014-2015
AFC
NFC
| New England | 11 | 5 |
| Miami | 9 | 7 |
| NY Jets | 5 | 11 |
| Buffalo | 3 | 13 |
| Cincinnati | 10 | 6 |
| Baltimore | 8 | 8 |
| Pittsburgh | 7 | 9 |
| Cleveland | 6 | 10 |
| Indianapolis | 10 | 6 |
| Tennessee | 7 | 9 |
| Houston | 7 | 9 |
| Jacksonville | 4 | 12 |
| Denver | 11 | 5 |
| San Diego | 9 | 7 |
| Kansas City | 8 | 8 |
| Oakland | 4 | 12 |
NFC
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tuesday, August 19, 2014
Pro-Wrestling and appealing to two audiences
(Warning: This post is about a meta-analysis of the WWE. Consider yourself warned)
There’s two audiences the WWE is trying to appeal to:
The young kids and the teenagers. Sure, there’s longtime fans like me-
but we tend to stay with the fed thick and thin. The WWE thrives as a business when they
appeal to one or both of those audiences.
In the Hulkamania years they appealed to the 7 year
olds. And it worked- until the 7 year olds grew into teenagers who
thought that Hogan wasn’t cool, and they weren’t able to recapture his appeal
with anyone else (Luger, Diesel)
In the “Attitude” era, the appealed to the teenagers.
And they were incredibly hot for about five years. But then the teenagers
grew out of wrestling- and since they hadn’t appealed to kids, they was no next
generation of fans ready to watch them.
So since then, they’ve been trying to appeal to both.
And in this John Cena was a boon. He was the uberface the kids could get
behind- so the WWE could always rely on him, and concentrate on appealing to
the teenagers with other cool faces (HHH, Orton. Punk). They had other faces
that appealed to the kids- Undertaker, Rey Mysterio- but Cena was the absolute
cornerstone.
((As an added bonus, Cena was so fun to hate for the
teenagers that whoever Cena was facing would usually get face heat from the
teenage crowd))
But now Cena’s nearing the end of his run. He’s been
the face for a decade- twice as long as Hogan, Rock, or Austin. That’s
incredible. But it’s ending- and while the WWE has people to fill the
‘cool face’ role to appeal to the teenagers, who is going to fill the role for
the 7 year old fan?
They’ve tested out other guys to be that uberface- remember
smiling Shaemus? But it hasn’t taken.
I’m suspecting that the reason Brock Lesnar is getting such
a megapush is that they want to build the next kids uberface- and what better
way to launch him than to beat the guy who broke the Undertaker’s Streak and
damned near squashed John Cena?
Right now, they are looking at Roman Reigns for that
role. And honestly? He’s probably their best bet. I don’t
know if he can appeal to kids the way Hogan or Cena did- but I KNOW guys like
Shaemus can’t fill that role. Reigns might be able to (notice the
emphasis on the ‘Superman punch’? Tell me that’s not appealing to kids)
In retrospect, losing Daniel Bryan really hurts- because
Bryan was the only guy who appealed to both sets of audiences equally.
The kids loved him because of the “YES” chant, the beard, and that he was so
small that he was the underdog. But he pulled off fantastic matches and
had enough snark (“Mr. Small Package”) to appeal to teens.
But they have guys who can appeal to teens- Ambrose leads
the pack right now. Ziggler might be able to do that. Hell- I still
have hope for Cody Rhodes.
But they need that uberface for the kids- and I think the
whole purpose of building up Lesnar is to sacrifice him for that next uberface
to the kids.
And if I’m wrong and he loses the belt back to Cena- or to a
part-timer like the Rock? Then it tells me the WWE doesn’t think they
don’t have another uberface close to being ready.
Saturday, July 19, 2014
Crowning Moment of Awesome- 07/19/2014
Weird Al Yankovich has a new album and is revealing 8 videos over 8 days on his website.
My own opinion is that the first three videos ("Tacky","Word Crimes", "Foil") are especially incredible- funny and brilliant music parodies. Weird Al has been putting on fantastic work for over 30 years. Watch and enjoy.
My own opinion is that the first three videos ("Tacky","Word Crimes", "Foil") are especially incredible- funny and brilliant music parodies. Weird Al has been putting on fantastic work for over 30 years. Watch and enjoy.
Sunday, July 6, 2014
So- back on the diet
Weight's been creeping up. Which annoys me, because I do work out on a regular basis. I know the reasons- I eat too much, I eat too fast, and I eat the wrong kind of foods.
So- back on a diet. A friend of mine lost 50 pounds on the Paleo Diet, so I'm giving that a try. Or at least partly- I'm willing to give up grains and dairy, and even eggs and beans for a few weeks (during the initial purge). But they can take my caffeine when they pry it from my cold, dead, still-shaking fingers.
On a semi-related note... There's a stand at the West Side market that sells dehydrated fruits and vegetables, and they are fantastic. I love strawberries, but two days after buying them they start to go bad. But dehydrated, they still taste great and can last for over a month. I'm getting so hooked I'm contemplating buying a dehydrating machine myself...
(And hey- fruits and vegetables are on the Paleo plan.)
So- back on a diet. A friend of mine lost 50 pounds on the Paleo Diet, so I'm giving that a try. Or at least partly- I'm willing to give up grains and dairy, and even eggs and beans for a few weeks (during the initial purge). But they can take my caffeine when they pry it from my cold, dead, still-shaking fingers.
On a semi-related note... There's a stand at the West Side market that sells dehydrated fruits and vegetables, and they are fantastic. I love strawberries, but two days after buying them they start to go bad. But dehydrated, they still taste great and can last for over a month. I'm getting so hooked I'm contemplating buying a dehydrating machine myself...
(And hey- fruits and vegetables are on the Paleo plan.)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)